News/Scholarly Article 2
When the TV Series, "Nip/Tuck", aired back during the summer of 2003, America had no idea what they were in for. "Nip/Tuck" pushed that fine line. Dylan Walsh and Julian McMahon starred in the hit TV series on FX. This "alternatively emotional, outlandish, sexual, graphic, tongue-in-cheek and gothic, the story of two handsome Miami plastic surgeons," (LA Times, 1) , was an instant hit. With the show moto that beauty is a curse to the world, it's demographic did not just include baby boomers, but younger viewers as well. It has maintain that demographic for five straight seasons. After the fourth season, "Nip/Tuck" has 3.9 million viewers.
All great things have to come to an end especially with TV programs. After seven seasons, 100 episodes, "Nip/Tuck" signed off the air. "It's the end of the first generation of cable originals that really made in-roads in television programming," said Brad Adgate, director of research for Horizon Media. "There are very few shows that have helped identify a network and that strike a chord on a lot of different fronts. 'Nip/Tuck' really hit the zeitgeist because it was so topical. It has a very secure place as one of the most impactful shows of the past decade of television."(LA Times, 1) "Nip/Tuck" paved the way even deep for more "edgy" shows to come through in the future. Being a big human interest, TV programs are going to become far more "edgy" than "Nip/Tuck" became.
In relation to my group's webisode, "Portable Media", one might think well "Nip/Tuck" has nothing to do with that. But, that is where people go wrong. What about the content we see on the portable media devices? Since the way was paved deeper by" Nip/Tuck" these portable media devices will have access to these "edgy" shows. The content for any type of media will be "edgy". That line keeps getting pushed, eventually it won't even exist. Even if this is a good thing or a bad thing, thats what we as a society have interest in. That is what gets us hooked on these programs. And, this is what the media gives back. Exactly, what we have asked for.
According to the Ferguson and Eastman's textbook on Media Programming, its talks about the Super Bowl incident. "Yet, on this one night, just for the Super Bowl, almost half the country's population came face-to-face with what mainstream television had become. They didn't like it". (page 124) If we didn't like it so much, they why did we asked for programs like "Nip/Tuck"? We have to be careful what we wish for, huh? It is what it is.
Snooki from MTV's hit show Jersey Shore gets punched.
We have since then come a long way in Broadcast Programming, and the "Jersey Shore" started to pump their fists. Again, another "edgy" program. At first it was bashed, then America fell in love with the cast. Much controversy was over the "Snooki Punch", and the full scene is not available anymore. America wanted more. Now, "Jersey Shore" will be pumping their fists for America once again this summer. Now, this brings it back to the question? America has come face-to-face of what mainstream TV has become, but they didn't like it. Then why keep asking the media for it? America loves it, there is no doubt about it.
Los Angeles Times Article
Jersey Shore Article
Nip/Tuck Photo
Media Programming Photo
Snooki gets punched